Saudi Self-Concept, Attitude and Factors Influencing their Satisfaction towards Dental Appearance: An Online Questionnaire Survey
2 Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, Email: mmmostafa@kku.edu.sa
3 Department of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Received: 16-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. amhsr-23-87165; Editor assigned: 19-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. amhsr-23-87165 (PQ); Reviewed: 03-Feb-2023 QC No. amhsr-23-87165; Revised: 10-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. amhsr-23-87165 (R); Published: 17-Feb-2023
Citation: Abouzeid HL, et al. Saudi Self-Concept, Attitude and Factors Influencing Their Satisfaction towards Dental Appearance- an Online Questionnaire Survey. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2022;13: 413-419
This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com
Abstract
Background: Self-perception of the facial aesthetics has been reported as an imperative and worldwide element influencing proficiency and emotions, in addition to academic and physical aspects of self-concept. The aim of the current study was to determine the possible factors that influence self-perceived dental appearance satisfaction among Saudi patients, to determine the factors that may influence their choice of treatment to improve their dental appearance and to verify their most common esthetically favored treatment modality.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey used an online questionnaire that consisted of 30-items divided into three sections. Questions included general questions on socio-demographic information, self-perceived dental appearance satisfaction in the anterior region, and respondents preferred dental treatment to improve their aesthetics.
Results: The study included 1503 Saudi adults (majority were females (75%) and 87.8% were from urban areas with an age range of 18 and 60 years and a mean age of 33.5 (± 10.8) years). Generally, 1003 (66.5%) of the participants were satisfied with the appearance of their teeth and smile. The most reported dental problems affecting their satisfaction were found to be unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings (28.3%). The most preferred dental intervention was “teeth cleaning, gum treatment and polishing” (80.2%). When simple logistic regression model was used, eight factors were found to have significant adjusted effect including urban residence (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.0-2.14), teeth color (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.19-0.34), crowding (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.30-0.56), unsatisfactory frontal teeth filling (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.45-0.85), broken frontal teeth (OR=0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.93), red inflamed gum (OR=0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95), covering teeth while smiling (OR=6.54; 95% CI: 4.85-8.80) and extent of gum display while smiling (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.44-0.88). A direct significant relation between self-perceived dental satisfaction and being informed by other individuals about their dental problems with a recorded statistical significance (P=0.044).
Conclusion: Two third of the respondents were generally satisfied with their dental appearance. The most reported dental problem was found to be discolored unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings. Saudi satisfaction was found to be affected by many factors including being informed by others that the appearance of their teeth is inappropriate.
Keywords
Patient satisfaction; Esthetics; Dental; Attitude; Awareness; Perception
Introduction
Dental appearance is of paramount importance in defining the attractiveness of a face, and hence has a great influence in people’s social relations [1]. It influences the perceptions of facial charm irrespective of individual’s gender or related facial appearance and significantly affects people’s physical fascination [2,3]. Self-perception of the facial aesthetics has been reported as an imperative and worldwide element influencing proficiency and emotions, in addition to academic and physical aspects of self-concept [3].
The significance of dental esthetics is related primarily to social relations and selections, profession aspiration and accomplishments of individuals [4,5]. It has been cited in the literature that people with fewer dental problems are deemed to have superior social skills, better intellectual success, and greater psychologic flexibility [6]. This is additionally supported by the point that adults with noticeable dental diseases are more hesitant to pursue employment because of their compromised facial appearance or speech. Provision of social and psychological support for those affected by their dental appearance was suggested by Somani. et al., since a significant association was found between compromised dental status on the one hand, and perceived poor social intelligence and academic performance on the other hand [7,8].
Many factors were found to play an important role in determining the general dental appearance including such as tooth color, shape, position, type of restoration, and the arrangement in the dental arch, particularly of the front teeth [1]. Additionally, a visually attractive smile was found to rely on the color, size, and shape of the tooth, beside the position of the upper lip, visibility of teeth and extent of gum display [9].
Several scholars attempted to assess the degree of patients’ satisfaction with respect to their dental appearance [10]. The studies showed that dental interventions such as orthodontic treatment and tooth whitening may increase the patients’ satisfaction with their dental appearance, perception of attractiveness and the quality of their life [11-13].
Teeth bleaching, esthetic restorations of anterior teeth, labial veneers, and esthetic crowns, in addition to orthodontic intervention are repeatedly requested by patients who are concerned about refining their dental appearance [14].
Individual self-concept regarding the dental appearance is considered an important determining factor of dental treatment seeking behavior and is largely influenced by self- perception, culture, and environment [15-17]. Hence, the provision and maintenance of patient’s satisfaction with respect to dental appearance are the basics of proper dental care [18].
The aim of the current study was to determine the possible factors that influence self-perceived dental appearance satisfaction among Saudi patients, to determine the factors that may influence their choice of treatment to improve their dental appearance and to verify their most common esthetically favored treatment modality.
Material and Methods
This cross-sectional online survey was conducted using google form questionnaire in the period between Janil and July 2020.
The study targeted adult Saudi individuals all over the Kingdom, who previously received any kind of dental treatment involving the esthetic region, with no clear evidence of cognitive disturbances.
The conduct of this research was ethically approved by the Institution Review Board (IRB) of King Khalid University, College of Dentistry. Informed consent was obtained from all the research participants and was included as a mandatory section in the google form. Participation in this study was completely voluntary and no incentive was offered.
The tool of data collection was an online, self-developed, validated self-administered questionnaire, which was completely anonymous without any possible identifiers. The questionnaire consisted of 30-item divided into three sections; the first section included general questions on socio-demographic information such as sex, age, level of education, work, and social status. Whereas the second section comprised questions on perceived dental appearance satisfaction, in addition to questions on their satisfaction with tooth color, shape, size, perceived malalignment (crowding, poorly aligned or protruding), inflammation in their gum, gummy smile, caries in anterior teeth, non-aesthetic anterior tooth colored restoration and presence of tooth fracture. The third section assessed patients’ perceived dental treatment of choice to improve their appearance; it included many treatment options such as orthodontic treatment, bleaching, cosmetic fillings, teeth polishing, replacement of old restorations by esthetic ones, surgical intervention or Botox injection to improve gum smile, and the use of dental implant to replace missing teeth. All questions were assessed with a yes or no response and no further query on quantity was attempted.
As the questionnaire was initially prepared in English, it was then translated into Arabic. The Arabic-translated version was then revised and approved by an expert who was fluent in both Arabic and English languages.
Then the finalized Arabic- version of the questionnaire was tested for validity by content validity testing by 2 experts. Its reliability was also checked by test and re-test on a random sample of 10 participants with two weeks interval. Feedback regarding problems understanding and answering the questionnaire was obtained and addressed promptly. Following these steps, the questionnaire was then converted into an online data collection tool using google forms.
Data analysis
Following data collection, it was revised, coded and fed to statistical software IBM SPSS version 22(SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL). All statistical analysis was done using two tailed tests. The data was subjected to descriptive statistics including mean and Standard Deviation (SD) for continuous variables and frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations for categorical variables. Pearson Chi-square statistics was used to compare the sex, age, education levels, work, and marital status of patients with their satisfaction response towards their dental appearance. Logistic regression was used as well where dental appearance satisfaction was set as the dependent variable while the demographic and tooth characteristics were the independent variables P<0.05 was significant.
Results
Participants’ general information
A total of 1503 Saudi adults, all over the Kingdom, aged between 18 and 60 years with a mean age of 33.5 (± 10.8) years responded to the online questionnaire in the period between Janil and July 2020. Majority of the respondents were females (75%) and 87.8% were from urban areas. As for education, 79.1% were university graduates and 43.5% were working, while 31.5% were students. Nearly half of the participants were married (49.4%) and 48.2% were single.
Exact of 501 (33.3%) respondents reported that they have been told that the appearance of their teeth is inappropriate, and the most reported problem was having discolored tooth (24.7%) followed by irregular tooth (20.1%), dental caries (15.6%), and spacing (15.4%) (Table 1).
Personal data | No | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Age in years | <20 years | 122 | 8.10% |
20-34 | 743 | 49.40% | |
35-44 | 319 | 21.20% | |
45-54 | 239 | 15.90% | |
55+ | 80 | 5.30% | |
Gender | Male | 375 | 25.00% |
Female | 1128 | 75.00% | |
Residence | Urban | 1319 | 87.80% |
Rural | 184 | 12.20% | |
Education | Basic | 41 | 2.70% |
Secondary | 273 | 18.20% | |
University | 1189 | 79.10% | |
Work | Not working | 247 | 16.40% |
Student | 474 | 31.50% | |
retired | 128 | 8.50% | |
Working | 654 | 43.50% | |
Marital status | Single | 724 | 48.20% |
Married | 742 | 49.40% | |
Divorced/ widow | 37 | 2.50% | |
Have you ever been told that the appearance of your teeth is inappropriate? | Yes | 501 | 33.30% |
No | 1002 | 66.70% | |
What was the negative comment on your teeth? | 6 | 1.20% | |
Broken | 24 | 4.70% | |
Caries | 79 | 15.60% | |
Cast | 45 | 8.90% | |
Coloured | 119 | 23.50% | |
Irregular | 102 | 20.10% | |
Protruded | 54 | 10.70% | |
Spacing | 78 | 15.40% |
Table 1: Personal data of general population in the study, Saudi Arabia.
Dental abnormalities as reported by study participants
Table 2 demonstrates dental abnormalities as reported by study participants and their satisfaction regarding dental appearance. Exact of 657 (43.5%) of the participants reported that they are satisfied with the colour of their teeth. The most reported dental problems affecting their satisfaction were unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings (28.3%) while protruded lower jaw was the least reported problem (6.2%).
Dental anomalies and satisfaction | Yes | No | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
No | % | No | % | |
Are you satisfied with the colour of your teeth? | 657 | 43.50% | 852 | 56.50% |
Have crowded teeth | 345 | 22.90% | 1164 | 77.10% |
Protruded frontal upper teeth | 372 | 24.70% | 1137 | 75.30% |
Protruded lower jaw | 93 | 6.20% | 1416 | 93.80% |
Frontal tooth caries | 334 | 22.10% | 1175 | 77.90% |
Unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings | 427 | 28.30% | 1082 | 71.70% |
Broken frontal tooth | 318 | 21.10% | 1191 | 78.90% |
Uncover teeth during laughing | 386 | 25.60% | 1123 | 74.40% |
Red inflamed gum | 321 | 21.30% | 1188 | 78.70% |
The appearance of a large area of gum while laughing? | 264 | 17.50% | 1245 | 82.50% |
Generally, satisfied about your teeth and laugh | 1003 | 66.50% | 506 | 33.50% |
Table 2: Dental abnormalities as reported by study participants and their satisfaction regarding dental appearance.
Preferred dental interventions to improve tooth appearance
Preferred dental interventions to improve tooth appearance, as perceived by participants, are illustrated in Table 3. The most preferred dental interventions were “teeth cleaning, gum treatment and polishing” (80.2%) followed by “cosmetic fillings” for teeth with caries (78.6%), whereas, respondents reported that “Botox injections to reduce the visible area of the gums” was the least needed intervention to improve their dental aesthetics constituting 25.5% (Table 3).
Interventions needed to improve tooth appearance | No. | % |
---|---|---|
Teeth cleaning, gum treatment and polishing | 1202 | 80.20% |
Make cosmetic fillings for teeth with caries | 1178 | 78.60% |
Teeth whitening | 1094 | 73.00% |
Replace old fillings with new cosmetic fillings | 1036 | 69.20% |
Orthodontic intervention | 1024 | 68.10% |
Root canal treatment (nerve removal) | 824 | 55.00% |
Tooth covering | 729 | 48.70% |
Dental implants | 645 | 43.40% |
Surgical intervention to reduce the visible area of the gums while laughing or smiling | 458 | 30.60% |
Make a partial or full unit (bridge) | 408 | 27.20% |
Dental Veneers | 398 | 26.60% |
Botox injections to reduce the visible area of the gums while smiling | 382 | 25.50% |
Table 3: Preferred dental interventions to improve tooth appearance as reported by study participants.
Participants’ satisfaction with their dental appearance
Generally, 1003 (66.5%) of the participants were satisfied with the appearance of their teeth and smile.
Association between participants’ general satisfaction and their personal data: Pearson chi square test was used to test the association between participants’ general satisfaction and their personal data including dental problems (Table 4). It was found that 68.5% of those who were never informed by others about their dental problems were satisfied compared to 63.3% of those who did, with a recorded statistical significance (P=0.044). Furthermore, 85.2% of those who were satisfied with their tooth color reflected a general satisfaction compared to 52% of those who were unsatisfied with their tooth color (P=0.001). Satisfaction was recorded among 72.9% of those did not suffer from crowding of teeth (P=0.001), 70% of those who do not suffer from protrusion of upper front teeth (P=0.001), 67.5% of those without protrusion of lower teeth, 71.2% of those who had no caries in the frontal tooth (P=0.001), and 71.9% of those who had satisfactory frontal tooth filling (P=0.001). Exact of 79.5% of those who uncover their tooth during smile were generally satisfied (P=0.001) and 70.8% of those who have normal shaped gum appearance reported general satisfaction level regarding their teeth (P=0.001).
Factors | Generally, satisfied about your teeth | P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | |||||
No. | % | No. | % | |||
Age in years | <20 years | 84 | 68.90% | 38 | 31.10% | 0.536 |
20-34 | 499 | 67.20% | 244 | 32.80% | ||
35-44 | 206 | 64.60% | 113 | 35.40% | ||
45-54 | 155 | 64.90% | 84 | 35.10% | ||
55+ | 59 | 73.80% | 21 | 26.30% | ||
Gender | Male | 259 | 69.10% | 116 | 30.90% | 0.269 |
Female | 744 | 66.00% | 384 | 34.00% | ||
Residence | Urban | 890 | 67.50% | 429 | 32.50% | 0.102 |
Rural | 113 | 61.40% | 71 | 38.60% | ||
Education | Basic | 30 | 73.20% | 11 | 26.80% | 0.486 |
Secondary | 176 | 64.50% | 97 | 35.50% | ||
University | 797 | 67.00% | 392 | 33.00% | ||
Work | Not working | 170 | 68.80% | 77 | 31.20% | 0.8 |
Student | 318 | 67.10% | 156 | 32.90% | ||
Retired | 82 | 64.10% | 46 | 35.90% | ||
Working | 433 | 66.20% | 221 | 33.80% | ||
Marital status | Single | 483 | 66.70% | 241 | 33.30% | 0.498 |
Married | 492 | 66.30% | 250 | 33.70% | ||
Divorced/ widow | 28 | 75.70% | 9 | 24.30% | ||
Have you ever been told that the appearance of your teeth is inappropriate? | Yes | 317 | 63.30% | 184 | 36.70% | .044* |
No | 686 | 68.50% | 316 | 31.50% | ||
Daily tooth brushing | Never | 28 | 71.80% | 11 | 28.20% | 0.687 |
Sometimes | 276 | 65.60% | 145 | 34.40% | ||
usually | 699 | 67.00% | 344 | 33.00% | ||
Are you satisfied with the colour of your teeth? | Yes | 560 | 85.20% | 97 | 14.80% | 0.001* |
No | 443 | 52.00% | 409 | 48.00% | ||
Have crowded teeth | Yes | 155 | 44.90% | 190 | 55.10% | 0.001* |
No | 848 | 72.90% | 316 | 27.10% | ||
Protruded frontal upper teeth | Yes | 207 | 55.60% | 165 | 44.40% | 0.001* |
No | 796 | 70.00% | 341 | 30.00% | ||
Protruded lower jaw | Yes | 47 | 50.50% | 46 | 49.50% | 0.001* |
No | 956 | 67.50% | 460 | 32.50% | ||
Frontal tooth caries | Yes | 166 | 49.70% | 168 | 50.30% | 0.001* |
No | 837 | 71.20% | 338 | 28.80% | ||
Unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings | Yes | 225 | 52.70% | 202 | 47.30% | 0.001* |
No | 778 | 71.90% | 304 | 28.10% | ||
Broken frontal tooth | Yes | 159 | 50.00% | 159 | 50.00% | 0.001* |
No | 844 | 70.90% | 347 | 29.10% | ||
Uncover teeth during laughing | Yes | 110 | 28.50% | 276 | 71.50% | 0.001* |
No | 893 | 79.50% | 230 | 20.50% | ||
Red inflamed gum | Yes | 157 | 48.90% | 164 | 51.10% | 0.001* |
No | 846 | 71.20% | 342 | 28.80% | ||
The appearance of a large area of gum while laughing? | Yes | 122 | 46.20% | 142 | 53.80% | 0.001* |
No | 881 | 70.80% | 364 | 29.20% |
Table 4: Participants’ general satisfaction as related to their personal data and dental problems.
Factors affecting participants’ satisfaction: Table 5 illustrates simple logistic regression model for factors affecting participants’ satisfaction regarding their dental appearance. The model includes all studied factors of which 8 factors were found to have a significant adjusted effect. Factors included urban residence as those who were from urban areas had 1.5 times more satisfaction regarding their dental appearance as related to others keeping all other factors constant (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.0-2.14). Considering teeth color; participants with discolored teeth were found to have 74% less satisfaction rate than those who did not suffer tooth discoloration when all other factors were adjusted (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.19-0.34). As for crowding, participants with crowded teeth had 59% less satisfaction rate adjusting for other factors (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.30-0.56). Moreover, participants with unsatisfactory frontal teeth filling reported 58% less satisfaction rate compared to those without (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.45-0.85). Broken frontal teeth were associated with 32% less satisfaction rate regarding tooth appearance (OR=0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.93). Besides, participants who uncover their teeth while smiling were 6 times more satisfied than others who cover their teeth on smiling (OR=6.54; 95% CI: 4.85-8.80). Red inflamed gum was associated with 31% less satisfaction than others keeping all other factors constant (OR=0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95). Participants who experience a display of a large gum area while smiling were 38% less satisfied as compared to others (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.44-0.88).
Factors | B | S.E. | Sig. | ORA | 95% C.I for ORA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
Age | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.707 | 1.04 | 0.86 | 1.24 |
Male | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.529 | 1.1 | 0.79 | 1.56 |
Urban residence | 0.38 | 0.2 | 0.049 | 1.45 | 1 | 2.14 |
High Education | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.825 | 1.03 | 0.78 | 1.37 |
Working | -0.08 | 0.07 | 0.225 | 0.92 | 0.8 | 1.05 |
Married | -0.04 | 0.17 | 0.804 | 0.96 | 0.69 | 1.34 |
Inappropriate teeth | -0.23 | 0.14 | 0.106 | 0.79 | 0.6 | 1.05 |
coloured | -1.36 | 0.15 | 0.001 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.34 |
Crowded teeth | -0.89 | 0.16 | 0.001 | 0.41 | 0.3 | 0.56 |
Protrusion | -0.14 | 0.15 | 0.349 | 0.87 | 0.64 | 1.17 |
Protruded lower jaw | -0.23 | 0.28 | 0.409 | 0.8 | 0.46 | 1.37 |
Dental caries | -0.07 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 1.31 |
Unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings | -0.48 | 0.16 | 0.003 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.85 |
Broken frontal tooth | -0.39 | 0.17 | 0.018 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.93 |
Uncover teeth during smile | 1.88 | 0.15 | 0.001 | 6.54 | 4.85 | 8.8 |
Red inflamed gum | -0.38 | 0.16 | 0.021 | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.95 |
The appearance of a large area of gum while laughing | -0.47 | 0.18 | 0.007 | 0.62 | 0.44 | 0.88 |
Constant | -5.33 | 1.09 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5: Simple logistic regression model for factors affecting participants’ satisfaction regarding dental appearance.
Discussion
Perceived dental appearance varies among different populations and among individuals in the same population [19]. The current study found that among the 1503 Saudi adults who responded to the online questionnaire, 66.5% were satisfied with their dental appearance and smile. This finding came in accordance with earlier studies conducted among different populations. For instance, Akarslan and colleagues in their study which included 1,014 patients at a dental school in Ankara, Turkey reported that (57.3%) were satisfied with their dental appearance [16]. Similarly, 76% of stratified sample of adults in the United Kingdom reported self-satisfaction with their dental aesthetics [20]. However, dissimilar findings were cited by a study conducted in Malaysia, where the prevalence of dissatisfaction with dental appearance was estimated to be 62.7% among the studied population [21].
In the literature, the determining factors of perceived dental appearance were found to be cultural factors and individual preferences which differ among individuals and cultures and vary over time [1]. Generally, older individuals (aged 55 and above) were reported to be more likely satisfied with their dental appearance as compared to younger age groups [16, 20] pointing out to the fact that their dental aesthetics is not as imperative to older than to younger people [19]. The present study, however, found no significant association between age and satisfaction with dental aesthetics reflecting that dental appearance is becoming likewise important in both older and younger adult populations. Similar conclusion was cited in another study which attributed finding to the strong influence of the media which enhance males and females of all ages to seek looking younger and healthier [21]. Another study of 180 individuals took six different age groups ranging from 13 to 64 years cited that self- satisfaction with tooth color was not age-dependent [22]. A Sweden research conducted with two large samples of 8,881 and 8,563 aged 50 and 60 years respectively, revealed that most of the participants in both age groups consider aesthetically pleasant teeth are of paramount importance [23]. One more study on aged individuals of 73 to 75 year-old in Germany, reported that the significance of dental aesthetics to general appearance was considered key by the participants [24].
It is a popular belief that females are more considered about their appearance than males. Indeed, women patients were found to be more concerned with their dental appearance than men besides being more precarious in judging their dental appearance [19,24]. Several results reported women to express greater dissatisfaction with dental appearance and tooth color than men. While a study in Sweden cited that men considered dental appearance as more important than women [14,23]. The present study, on the other hand, found that the differences between genders were not significant. Similar findings were reported in the literature [16,25].
Although “Teeth whitening” treatment was amongst the preferred dental treatments chosen by the studied population constituting (73.0%), however, the most frequently reported required dental interventions were found to be “teeth cleaning, gum treatment and polishing” (followed by “cosmetic fillings” for teeth with caries. This preference of “easier and less painful” dental treatments over the more invasive interventions such as teeth veneers and crowns came in accordance with many previous studies which reported “bleaching” as the mostdesired basic dental intervention to improve dental appearance [21]. This could be justified by the fact that many patients were dissatisfied with their dental appearance. Furthermore, a study of 180 female patients in South London showed that whitened teeth were favored over teeth with original color with the former linked to superior attractiveness [5].
Logistic regression model indicated that participants with discolored anterior teeth had 74% less satisfaction rate than those who did not suffer tooth discoloration when all other factors were adjusted (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.19-0.34). Likewise, a research conducted by Maghaireh, et al. indicated that only a few number of the individuals were satisfied with the color of their anterior teeth and that the patients’ general satisfaction with dental appearance was influenced significantly by anterior teeth color [26]. This may be justified by the fact that individuals may favor white and shiny teeth over natural appearance, and individuals lean towards rating the shade of their teeth darker than the professional or the actual shade [27].
Several scholars found that self-reported mal-aligned teeth and upper anterior crowding are linked to individuals’ satisfaction with dental appearance [14,28]. Moreover, People who perceived their facial profiles as being unlike typical ones, showed an increased probability of being dissatisfied with their facial appearance [29]. Teeth mal-alignment and crowding are amongst the commonest malocclusion traits cited in the literature [30- 32] the present study revealed a strong association between individuals’ perceptions of having these traits and contentment with general dental appearance. However, these findings contradict the results of the study conducted in Malaysia by Tin-Oo and colleagues [21].These divergences underlined the wide individual discrepancy in perception of adequate occlusal features. Comparative data in the present research found that the most commonly self-reported dental problems affecting individuals’ satisfaction were unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings (28.3%), this might be attributed to the fact that unacceptable frontal restorations affect both teeth color and alignment and hence affecting the individuals’ general dental appearance.
The present study indicated a significant direct relation between self-perceived dental satisfaction and being informed by other individuals about their dental problems with a recorded statistical significance (P=0.044). This finding highlights the psychological influence of the surrounding environment on individuals’ appreciation of their appearance. However, this factor was not studied earlier as a possible contributing factor to self-perceived dental satisfaction; therefore, further studies are required in this context.
Conclusion
Two third of the respondents were generally satisfied with their dental appearance. The most reported dental problem was found to be discolored unsatisfactory frontal tooth fillings (28.3%). 8 factors were found to have a significant adjusted effect on participants’ satisfaction including urban residence, teeth color, crowding, unsatisfactory frontal teeth filling, broken frontal teeth, red inflamed gum, covering teeth while smiling and extent of gum display while smiling. One third of respondents reported being informed by others that the appearance of their teeth is inappropriate. Relevant findings highlight the possible psychological influence of the surrounding environment on individuals’ appreciation of their appearance.
Limitations
This study finding may be limited by being entirely based on selfreports by participants, as no attempts were made to correlate participants’ self- perceived evaluation of their dental problems and their dental records or to compare participants’ preferred dental treatments and professional assessments of their actual treatment needs. Nevertheless, the characteristically subjective nature of dental satisfaction qualifies this research, a valuable relevant data in dental care of young adults particularly in this era, where individual-oriented dental care delivery approach is preferred over dentist-oriented dental care delivery approach.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: H.L.A., S.M.A., T.S.G. and R.T.; data curation: S.M.A., W.A.A, and A.E.E.; formal analysis: H.L.A. and A.E.E; investigation: S.M.A.,T.S.G., R.T. and H.L.A.; methodology: H.L.A. and M.M.M..; software: H.L.A., S.M.A., W.A.A. and A.E.E.; supervision: H.L.A AND A.E.E.; validation: M.M.M.; writing – Original Draft Preparation: M.M.M and H.L.A ; writing – Review & Editing: M.M.M., H.L.A. and S.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- Qualtrough AJ, Burke FJ. A look at dental esthetics. Quintessence international.1994;25:7-14.
- York J, Holtzman J. Facial attractiveness and the aged. Special care in Dentistry. 1999;19:84-88.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Phillips C, Beal KNE. Self-concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. The Angle orthodontist. 2009;79:12-16.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Feng X, Newton J, Robinson PG, The impact of dental appearance on perceptions of personal characteristics among Chinese people in the United Kingdom. International Dental Journal. 2001;51:282-286.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Kershaw S, Newton J, Williams D. The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: Comparisons of unmodified, decayed and'whitened'teeth. British Dental Journal. 2008;204:E9-E9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Newton JT, Prabhu N, Robinson PG. The impact of dental appearance on the appraisal of personal characteristics. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16.
- Somani A, Newton JT, Dunne S, Gilbert DB. The impact of visible dental decay on social judgements: comparison of the effects of location and extent of lesion. International Dental Journal. 2010.; 60:169-174.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1981;79:399-415.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman A. Smile attractiveness: Self-perception and influence on personality. The Angle Orthodontist. 2007;77:759-765.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Azodo C, Ogbomo A. Self evaluated dental appearance satisfaction among young adults. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2014. 4:604-607.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Silvola AS, Varimo M, Tolvanen M, Rusanen J, Lahti S, et al. Dental esthetics and quality of life in adults with severe malocclusion before and after treatment. Angle Orthodontist. 2014. 84:594-599.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- John MT, Slade G, Szentpétery, Setz J. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17: 503-11.
- Mehl C, Harder S, Lin J, Vollrath O, Kern M. Perception of dental esthetics: Influence of restoration type, symmetry, and color in four different countries. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015; 28:60-4.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2007;138:805-808.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Pietilä T, Pietil I. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in eastern Finland. Community Dental Health. 1996;13:139-144.
- Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian Journal of Dental Research; 2009: 20:195.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Gržić R, Spalj S, Lajnert V, Glavicić S, Uhac I, et al. Factors influencing a patient's decision to choose the type of treatment to improve dental esthetics. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2012;69: 978-985.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Mack MR. Perspective of facial esthetics in dental treatment planning. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1996;75:169-176.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Vallittu PK, Vallittu AS, Lassila VP. Dental aesthetics: A survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. Journal of dentistry. 1996;24:335-338.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Alkhatib MN, Holt R, Bedi R. Age and perception of dental appearance and tooth colour. Gerodontology. 2005;22: 32-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Odioso L, Gibb R, Gerlach R. Impact of demographic, behavioral, and dental care utilization parameters on tooth color and personal satisfaction. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000:S35.
- Carlsson GE, Johansson A, Johansson A, Ordell S, Ekbäck G, et al. Attitudes toward dental appearance in 50‐and 60‐year‐old subjects living in Sweden. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2008;20:46-55.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Hassel A, Wegener I, Rolko C, Nitschke I. Self‐rating of satisfaction with dental appearance in an elderly German population. International Dental Journal. 2008;58:98-102.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Xiao J, Zhou XD, Zhu WC, Zhang B, Li JY, et al. The prevalence of tooth discolouration and the self‐satisfaction with tooth colour in a Chinese urban population. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2007;34: 351-360.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Maghaireh GA, Alzraikat H, Taha NA. Satisfaction with dental appearance and attitude toward improving dental esthetics among patients attending a dental teaching center. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2016. 17:16-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Grossman Y, Bachner Y, Levin L. Patients' self-perception of tooth shade in relation to professionally objective evaluation. Quintessence International, 2010. 41:e80-3.
- Marques LS, Filogônio CA, Filogônio CB, Pereira LJ, Pordeus IA, et al. Aesthetic impact of malocclusion in the daily living of Brazilian adolescents. Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;36: 152-159.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Tufekci E, Jahangiri A, Lindauer SJ. Perception of profile among laypeople, dental students and orthodontic patients. The Angle Orthodontist. 2008;78:983-987.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Jonsson T, Arnlaugsson S, Karlsson KO, Ragnarsson B, Arnarson EO, et al. Orthodontic treatment experience and prevalence of malocclusion traits in an Icelandic adult population. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131:8.e11-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Onyeaso CO. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2004;126:604-607.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]
- Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F. Malocclusion and occlusal traits in an urban Iranian population. An epidemiological study of 11-to 14-year-old children. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31:477-484.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Indexed]